After the city council expressed strong reservations about the proposed charter overhaul, the charter review committee met on June 17 to only bring forward changes that are considered uncontroversial.
The most comprehensive change is cosmetic. The document has been reduced to 9 sections from 18, and obsolete sections like dance hall regulations have been removed. A glossary and a complete description of the city’s boundaries were added, and the phrase “qualified elector” has been replaced by “resident” and “registered voter” as appropriate.
Proposed changes to allow alternative procurement methods — e.g., design-build contracts — were shelved after the June 15 city council meeting shifted from the overall review of the charter proposal to an extended discussion of procurement methods. This led Council Member Suds Jain to propose a separate charter ballot measure on procurement. The city manager’s signing limit for deploying city forces on public works projects is also unchanged ($1,000), as it’s part of the procurement procedures.
No civil service changes will be made because the committee was unable to get agreement from all city unions by the deadline.
The committee agreed that it will recommend the following changes to the council:
- Formalize the position of Assistant City Clerk as a civil service professional who performs the tasks of the city clerk’s office and reports to the city manager.
- Makes clear that the elected police chief is the operational head of the police department, with a duty to inform and advise the city manager and council about police matters. A proposal to increase qualifications for the elected police chief was dropped in the face of concerns that there would be no qualified candidates. The current charter says nothing about who has ultimate authority over the police department.
- Permit alternative budgeting methods such as the city’s current biennial budget cycle.
- Expand the library board of trustees to seven members from five and grant the board authority to approve or disapprove of city librarian appointments.
- Formalize the Salary Setting commission and its authority over setting the compensation of elected officials.
- Allows the lease of dedicated parkland for “secondary uses” that do not “materially impact” underlying Park uses if approved by two-thirds vote of Council — generally, five votes. Any revenue must be used for parks and recreation purposes. The proposal doesn’t define what these uses are, nor what would be considered a material impact.
The revised proposal goes to the council on July 7. The council must make a final decision by July 14 for a measure on the November 2026 ballot. You can find the committee’s final report at tinyurl.com/sc-proposed-charter-rpt-2026.
Carolyn Schuk can be reached at carolyn@santaclaraweekly.com.
Related Charter Review Posts:
Charter Changes Move Forward Despite Division
EdBoard: Hey, Glen, We’re Listening
8 Months in the Making, Santa Clara Charter Overhaul Heads to Council
Police Union Shapes Charter Review Committee — Out of Public View
Santa Clara’s Charter Overhaul: Six Months of Work, One Stubborn Sticking Point
Charter Review Committee: Clear Direction on Library Board Changes, At Sea on Elected Police Chief Authority
Planning Commission Discusses Charter Changes
Charter Review Committee: Biggest Recommendation is Charter Reorganization
Charter Review Committee Digs Into Charter Details
Charter Review Subcommittees Raise Transparency Concerns
Santa Clara 2025 Charter Review Committee Gets to Work
2025 Charter Review Committee Set
